Branched out of Wind energy: relax the 10H distance rule
Ruben: My file is hanging in t-02. Repeating the warning here because it belongs here: unsorted, no source grading, and I cannot trace two of the numbers back. Somebody should take it apart rather than cite it.
Sarah: Objection with a counter-proposal. We currently have no checked figure on how much climate and energy weigh electorally in Bavaria. So we do not put a sentence like “this moves people” into the paper either. Proposal: someone takes the official post-election analyses of the 2023 Landtag election and enters three sourced figures with access dates here. Until then the field in the paper stays empty and says so.
Stufe-0-Prüfnotiz (automated)
Automatic check per the Volt Bayern policy-discussion process, section 5. A note, never a block: nothing here stops discussion, only the move to Voting needs the Level 1 review.
1. Level of competence (state law?)
Unclear — no matching topic in the routing map, needs a human look before Formulation
2. Volt position (portfolio match)
No known position yet.
The provided excerpts do not contain any specific policy positions, voter sentiment analysis, or strategic statements regarding the importance of issues to voters in Bavaria. While the documents discuss general electoral reform for the European Parliament and internal organizational procedures, they do not address regional voter priorities in Bavaria specifically. Therefore, no classification can be made based on the given text.
In short: Volt does not state anything specific about the importance of issues to voters in Bavaria in the provided excerpts.
No matching source found in the checked portfolio.
3. Budget check
To review. Art. 73 Bavarian Constitution (BV) excludes the state budget (Staatshaushalt) from referendums (Volksbegehren); how far that exclusion reaches is unsettled (see Radentscheid Bayern and Mietenstopp precedents, where the issue was competence, not budget). This bot does not assess budget impact, that needs the Level 1 review before a Formulation thread moves to Voting.
Generated 2026-09-01T19:47:57.301Z by plenum-bruecke. Retrieval is deterministic (full-text search over the portfolio); the classification in part 2 used a language model (Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8) restricted to the excerpts shown to it. Report an error by replying in this thread.
Kopf
Maintained by plenum-bruecke, updated 2026-09-01T19:47:57.537Z.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Phase | Initiation (1 of 5) |
| Type | Sammel-Thread (no deadline, open until it wanders into the archive) |
| Deadline | none (Sammel-Thread, see section 5a) |
| Level result (Stufe 0) | unclear |
Roles
- Treibt (opens, branches, closes, writes the record): gero
Subject tracks (Fachbausteine) sit on this thread’s decision thread once it branches into one, not on a collection thread.
Phase changes here always mean: tag changed + this post updated, together, by the same call (tools/phase-setzen.mjs or the leitstand). The level-0 review below is a note, not a lock — see the Stufe-0-Prüfnotiz post in this thread for the full check.